Pakistan Economic and Social Review - Lahore

PAKISTAN ECONOMIC and SOCIAL REVIEW

School of Economics, University of the Punjab, Lahore
ISSN (print): 1011-002X
ISSN (online): 2224-4174

Welfare Implications of Energy Subsidy Reforms Under the IMF Stabilization Program: The Case of Household Sector in Pakistan

  • FAISAL MEHMOOD MIRZA/
  • Khalid Waleed/
  • Abre-Rehmat Qurat-ul-Ann/
  • December 31, 2022
Keywords
Welfare implications, Energy Subsidy Reforms, IMF, Household sector, Pakistan
Abstract

Pakistan entered IMF extended fund facility program in 2019 where one of the commitments was to reduce the subsidies in the energy sector. Withdrawal of subsidies led to rapid increase in the prices of energy products causing reallocations within the household budget, resulting into pervasive implications for household welfare. Bearing this in view, current study analyzes effects of exponential fuel price increases on household welfare in Pakistan due to subsidy reforms and international oil price changes, at national and disaggregated provincial levels for different income quintiles. Changes in fuel consumption patterns have been examined using Quadratic Approximation of Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) through Iterated Linear Least Squares (ILLS) method. Subsequently, the welfare impacts of fuel price changes have been calculated by employing the computed elasticities through QUAIDS. The micro-level data from Household Integrated Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2018-19 was used for this purpose. The empirical estimates of QUAIDS and compensated price elasticities show that the fuels are price elastic in rural areas, and price inelastic in urban areas. Similarly, the household fuel consumption expenditures by upper quintiles are price inelastic while the expenditures by lower quintiles are price elastic across the provinces. The household welfare computed through compensating variation estimates indicates significant welfare losses to households in Pakistan. These losses are higher for the lower income strata. This calls for targeted subsidy programs to insulate poorer households from energy price shocks. Effective policy implementation related to existing and upcoming energy subsidy and taxation frameworks can maintain household welfare at an acceptable level.

References

Abrar, M. A.-u.-I., Ali, M., Bashir, U., & Khan, K. (2019). Energy Pricing Policies and Consumers' Welfare: Evidence from Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 24(1), 1-28.

Acharya, R. H., & Sadath, A. C. (2017). Implications of energy subsidy reform in India. Energy Policy, 102, 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.036

Arze del Granado, F. J., Coady, D., & Gillingham, R. (2012). The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies: A Review of Evidence for Developing Countries. World Development, 40(11), 2234-2248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.005

Awan, H. S., Samad, G., & Faraz, N. (2019). Electricity Subsidies and Welfare Analysis: The Perspective of Pakistan. PIDE Working Papers, 164/CEEDD(17).

Aziz, S., Yaseen, M. R., & Anwar, S. (2016). Impact of Rising Energy Prices on Consumer’s Welfare: A Case Study of Pakistan [Journal Article]. The Pakistan Development Review, 55(4), 605-618.

Bansal, P., & Dua, R. (2022). Fuel consumption elasticities, rebound effect and feebate effectiveness in the Indian and Chinese new car markets arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08995.

Bhuvandas, D., & Gundimeda, H. (2020). Welfare impacts of transport fuel price changes on Indian households: An application of LA-AIDS model. Energy Policy, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111583

Blundell, R., & Robin, J.-M. (1999). Estimation in Large and Disaggregated Demand Systems: An Estimator for Conditionally Linear Systems. Journal of Applied Econometrics 14, 209-232.

BuShehri, M. A. M., & Wohlgenant, M. K. (2012). Measuring the welfare effects of reducing a subsidy on a commodity using micro-models: An application to Kuwait's residential demand for electricity. Energy Economics, 34(2), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.001

Clements, B., Coady, D., Fabrizio, S., Gupta, S., & Shang, B. (2014). Energy subsidies: How large are they and how can they be reformed? Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.3.1.bcle

Coady, D., Parry, I., Sears, L., & Shang, B. (2015). How Large are Global Energy Subsidies? IMF Working Paper Series, WP15(105).

Dennis, A. (2016). Household welfare implications of fossil fuel subsidy reforms in developing countries. Energy Policy, 96, 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.039

Freund, C. L., & Wallich, C. I. (1996). The Welfare Effects of Raising Household Energy Prices in Poland. The Energy Journal, 17(1), 53-77.

Friedman, J., & Levinsohn, J. (2002). The Distributional Impacts of Indonesia's Financial Crisis on Household Welfare: A "Rapid Response" Methodology. The World Bank Economic Review, 16(3), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhfOOl

GOP, G. o. P. (2021a). National Electricity Policy 2021. Ministry of Energy (Power Division).

GOP, G. o. P. (2021b). Policy guidelines of Ministry of Energy. Ministry of Energy (Power Division).

Gundimeda, H., & Köhlin, G. (2008). Fuel demand elasticities for energy and environmental policies: Indian sample survey evidence. Energy Economics, 30(2), 517-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.10.014

Hancevic, P., Cont, W., & Navajas, F. (2016). Energy populism and household welfare. Energy Economics, 56, 464-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.03.027

Ilyas, R., Hussain, K., Ullah, M. Z., & Xue, J. (2022). Distributional impact of phasing out residential electricity subsidies on household welfare. Energy Policy, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112825

IMF, I. M. F. (2019). First Review Under The Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility and Request for Modification of Performance Criteria-Press Release, STaff Report and Statement by the Executive Director for Pakisatn. IMF Country Report No. 19/380.

Irfan, M., Cameron, M. P., & Hassan, G. (2018). Household energy elasticities and policy implications for Pakistan. Energy Policy, 113, 633-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.041

Lecocq, S. E., & Robin, J.-M. (2015). Estimating Almost-Ideal Demand Systems with Endogenous Regressors. The Stata Journal, 15 (2), 554-573.

Lin, B., & Jiang, Z. (2011). Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform. Energy Economics, 33(2), 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.005

Moshiri, S., & Martinez Santillan, M. A. (2018). The welfare effects of energy price changes due to energy market reform in Mexico. Energy Policy, 113, 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.035

Pacudan, R., & Hamdan, M. (2019). Electricity tariff reforms, welfare impacts, and energy poverty implications. Energy Policy, 132, 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.033

Renner, S., Lay, J., & Schleicher, M. (2018). The effects of energy price changes: heterogeneous welfare impacts and energy poverty in Indonesia. Environment and Development Economics, 24(2), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x18000402

Sovacool, B. K. (2017). Reviewing, Reforming, and Rethinking Global Energy Subsidies: Towards a Political Economy Research Agenda. Ecological Economics, 135, 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.009

Waleed, K., & Mirza, F. M. (2020). Examining behavioral patterns in household fuel consumption using two-stage-budgeting framework for energy and environmental policies: Evidence based on micro data from Pakistan. Energy Policy, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111835

Yu, X. (2014). Raising food prices and welfare change: a simple calibration. Applied Economics Letters, 21(9), 643-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.879281

Zhang, F. (2015). Energy Price Reform and Household Welfare: The Case of Turkey. The Energy Journal, 36(2), 71-95.

Statistics

Author(s):

Professor of Economics at the University of Gujrat, Gujrat

Pakistan

Pakistan

Pakistan

Details:

Type: Articles
Volume: 60
Issue: 2
Language: English
Id: 6405bb3d7ddd0
Pages 221 - 249
Discipline: Economics
Published December 31, 2022

Statistics

  • 197
  • 39
  • 60

Copyrights

The research published by Pakistan Economic and Social Review (PESR) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. It allows readers to Share_ copy and redistribute, Adapt_ remix and transform. PESR offers free full text downloading to its online contents to all readers. No subscription fee is required to read and download online articles.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.